are
I
agree
EJeffries
27.6.30.
Mer Bickle
I am not clear
that
هر
4
committed to regard the peirod
of training in the case
of Mr. Church
as service for we rements or
His true in his case
apparently in others
be
pension.
(+
see 10 in 5^;
52772/28)
that he was allowed full salary
while undergoing
the course
best in
вал
the offer of appointment (see 3 in
I to not see a
any
سمعة
promise that the period womed
PF. 26847
count for increments
pension.
On the contraryg.
that letter
says that (para 2) that his service during the three years of probation
will count for leave & pension. thes excluding anything earlier, telsewhere in the letter it is made plain that the engagement is for
the date of armin
3
years from
in the Tolony.
erial
Motons
2/7/30
The Hony Colitist shows that no Church
was in an nemment on
2J M
any, 1928,
twelve
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.